SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Ker) 123

Judges : K.A.NAYAR
Vishnu Trading Company - Appellant
Versus
Asst.Commissioner - Respondent
Case No : O.P.No.1868 of 1992
Decided On : 06/03/1992
Advocates Appeared :
Premjith Nagendran For Petitioner Govt. Pleader (S. Vijayan Nair)For Respondents

The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of the dealer to receive delivery notes in book form or blank delivery notes in advance, as per the relevant provisions of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 and associated Rules.

Headnote:

delivery notes - entitlement of dealer - Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, Section 29, Rule 32, Rule 35 - The court held that the petitioner is entitled to get delivery notes in book form or blank delivery notes in advance, as per the relevant provisions of the Act and Rules.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a dealer in spices, sought delivery notes from the statutory authority for the transport of goods in book form. The authority denied the supply of delivery notes in blank form, citing concerns of tax evasion. The petitioner argued that the insistence on obtaining delivery notes on each occasion after loading goods in the lorry was unjustified and created difficulties in transporting goods.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner is entitled to receive delivery notes in book form or blank delivery notes in advance, as per the relevant provisions of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 and the associated Rules.

Issues: The issues revolved around the entitlement of the petitioner to obtain delivery notes for the transport of goods, the legality of the authority's action in denying blank delivery notes, and the discriminatory nature of the denial.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the interpretation of Section 29, Rule 32, and Rule 35 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, which provided for the issuance of delivery notes in book form or blank delivery notes in advance to the dealer.

Final Decision: The court allowed the original petition and directed the statutory authority to issue delivery notes to the petitioner on payment of the specified fee.

Judgment :-

The short but interesting question arises for consideration in this original petition is whether the petitioner, a dealer, is entitled to get delivery note from the statutory authority for transport of goods in book form. The supply of delivery notes in blank form are denied to the petitioners on the ground that it may lead to tax evasion. The department feels on each occasion single delivery note should be given and if that procedure is adopted there will be an effective check on the dealer from evading tax. In view of this, the respondents are not issuing delivery note to the petitioner for transport of goods.

2. The petitioner is dealer in spices and it purchases spices from different places within the State. The petitioner's registered office is at Mattancherry, Cochin. The petitioner has to transport the goods purchased to its registered office or head office at Mattancherry. While transporting the goods the petitioner has to pass through several check posts within the State. To pass through the check post delivery notes will have to the shown to the officers in charge of the check posts. There are several check posts within the State and the goods have to be purchased at different places. The goods have to be transported on each occasion after purchasing and loading and if the petitioner or its agents have to rush to the respondents to get delivery note before transport, it will create in numerable difficulties and hardship and operate as an impediment in transporting the goods of the petitioner. The petitioner has aright to transport the goods and it has a fundamental right to carry on the business or trade. Reasonable restriction can no doubt be imposed and the question to be considered is whether the demand of the respondents or the insistence of the respondents to get delivery note on each occasion after loading goods in the lorry is justified. In short the question is whether the petitioner is entitled to get blank delivery notes in book form. I am not concerned with the expediency or the advisability of the procedure in the light of the intention of the respondents to check evasion of tax. I am only concerned with the legality of the action. Judicial audit of administrative action is the responsibility of this Court. With this purpose in mind, I looked into the relevant provisions in the Act.

3. Section 29 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 provides that if the Government considers that with a view to prevent or check evasion of tax under the Act in any place or places in the State it is necessary so to do, they may by notification in the Gazette, direct setting up of check posts at such place or places, and define the boundaries of such check posts and notify the area of the check posts include A within such boundaries, referred to as the notified area, and demarcate such boundaries by means of barriers or otherwise for the purpose of regulating the passage of goods across the notified area. S.29 further provides that no person shall transport within the State across or beyond the notified area any consignment of goods exceeding such quantity or value as may be prescribed by any vehicle or vessel unless he is in possession of (omitting unnecessary parts) a delivery note and a declaration in the prescribed form containing such particulars. Therefore, if the petitioner intends to purchase spices and transport the same toils godown within the State, no tax liability is attracted at that stage as spices are taxable only at the last purchase point in the State. To transport the goods the petitioner must have a delivery note and a declaration. S.57 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act is the rule making power. S.57(2)(a), (f), (i), and (o) are extracted hereunder:

Power to make rules: (1) The Government may, by notification in the Gazette, make rules to carry out the purposes of this Act.

(2) In particular, and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power, such rules may be provided for,-

(a)












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top