SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Ker) 228

M.M.PAREED PILLAY
Lokesh Naidu – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent


Judgment :-

While granting bail to the petitioner the Magistrate directed the sureties to produce solvency certificate. This is challenged by him on the ground that the Magistrate has no jurisdiction to hold so.

2. Section 437(3) Cr.P.C. provides that the Courts can impose any condition which it considers necessary in order to ensure the attendance of the accused in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him or in order to ensure prevention of commission of any offence similar to the one which he is accused of or of the commission of which he is suspected. That apart, the Courts can also impose conditions in the interest of justice.

3. The question that arises for consideration is whether the condition imposed by the Magistrate requiring the sureties to produce solvency certificate is beyond his powers. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that when the accused is granted bail on condition of the executing a bond with two solvent sureties insistence upon the production of solvency certificate is unwarranted. As the code gives wide discretion to the Magistrate to impose any condition which he finds necessary that the time of granting bail to the accused the c




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top