Judges : K.SREEDHARAN,L.MANOHARAN
Re : Director General Of Prosecution, - Appellant
Versus
In Re : Director General Of Prosecution - Respondent
Case No : Criminal Reference 2 of 1992
Decided On : 10/16/1992
Advocates Appeared :
For the Petitioner: M. Ratna Singh, T.R. Raman Pillai, Amicus Curiae.
Criminal Procedure - Special Court - Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Section 395(2) - Procedure for trial of offences under the Act and Indian Penal Code - Special Court's jurisdiction and powers - Cognizance of offences - Trial procedure - Jurisdiction of Special Court - Powers of Special Court - Trial of offences under the Act and Indian Penal Code
Fact of the Case:
The Sessions Judge, Thalassery referred questions regarding the correct procedure to be followed by a Special Court when it receives a final report disclosing offences punishable under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 as well as offences punishable under the Indian Penal Code. The questions also pertained to the further procedure to be followed if the course followed by the Court in taking cognizance of offences punishable under the Indian Penal Code along with offences punishable under the Act was wrong.
Finding of the Court:
The Court analyzed the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, and relevant case law to determine the correct procedure to be followed by a Special Court. It found that the Special Court, constituted as a Court of Session, is a Court of original criminal jurisdiction and should follow the ordinary rules of procedure applicable to it as provided in the Code. The Court also held that the Special Court can take cognizance of offences under the Indian Penal Code along with the offences under the Act without an order of commitment by a Magistrate.
Issues: The issues involved the correct procedure to be followed by a Special Court when receiving a final report disclosing offences punishable under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 as well as offences punishable under the Indian Penal Code, and the jurisdiction and powers of the Special Court in taking cognizance of such offences.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court's decision was based on the interpretation of the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, and relevant case law. It emphasized that the Special Court, as a Court of original criminal jurisdiction, can take cognizance of offences under the Indian Penal Code along with the offences under the Act without an order of commitment by a Magistrate.
Final Decision: The Court directed the Sessions Judge, Thalassery to proceed with the trial of the cases for offences punishable under section 3 of the Act as well as for offences punishable under the Indian Penal Code.
SREEDHARAN, J.
This reference under section 395(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure is at the instance of the Sessions Judge, Thalassery. He is the Special Court specified under section 14 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 to try offences under that Act. Questions referred by him are :-
(1) What is the correct procedure to be followed by a Special Court when it receives a final report disclosing offences punishable under section 3 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 as well as offences punishable under the Indian Penal Code and
(2) If the course followed by this Court in taking cognizance of offences punishable under the Indian Penal Code also along with offences punishable under section 3 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act were (as it appears to be) wrong, what further procedure is to be followed.
2. Section 14 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, hereinafter referred to as the Act, is in the following terms :-
"For the purpose of providing for speedy trial, the State Government shall, with the concurrence of the Chief Justice of the High Court, by notification in the Official Gazette, specify for each district a Court of Session to be a Special Court to try the offences under this Act."
Sessions Court, Thalassery is one of the Courts of Sessions specified to be a Special Court to try offences under the Act. The first question that is posed is one relating to the correct procedure to be followed by a Special Court when it receives a final report disclosing offences punishable under the Act.
3. Section 4 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, hereinafter referred to as the Code, provides for trial of offences under the Indian Penal Code and other laws. That section has two sub-sections. Sub-section (1) states that all offences under the Indian Penal Code shall be investigated, inquired into, tried, and otherwise dealt with according to the provisions contained in the Code. As per sub-section (2), all offences under any other law shall be investigated, inquired into, tried or otherwise dealt with according to the provisions of the Code, but subject to any enactment for the time being in force regulating the manner or place of investigating, inquiring into, trying or otherwise dealing with such offences. The conjoint effect of these provisions is that in the absence of specific provision made in the statute indicating that offences will have to be investigated, inquired into, tried and otherwise dealt with according to that statute, the same will have to be investigated, inquired into tried and otherwise dealt with according to the provisions contained in the Code. The provisions of the Special Act would apply and prevail over the Code. When the special law does not prescribe any particular procedure, the provisions contained in the Code will govern the investigation, inquiry and trial of cases by criminal courts. In other words, the Code is the parent statute which provides for investigation, inquiry, trial or otherwise dealing with offences.
4. Section 5 of the Code states that nothing contained in the Code, shall, in the absence of a specific provision to the contrary, affect any special or local law for the time being in force, or any special jurisdiction or power conferred, or any special form of procedure prescribed, by any other law for the time being in force. If an act creating an offence does not prescribe any special form of procedure, the provisions contained in the Code will be applicable for the trial for such offences.
5. Section 26 of the Code prescribes the criminal courts by which offences under the I.P.C. or other laws are triable. As per clause (a) of the Section, the High Court and the Court of Session have concurrent jurisdiction to try any offence under the Indian Penal Code. Judicial Magistrate of I class and Judicial
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.