SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Ker) 295

BALANARAYANA MARAR
Karunakara Pisharady – Appellant
Versus
Raman – Respondent


Judgment :-

The first plaintiff in the suit O.S.135 of 1977 on the file of the Munsiff-Magistrate's Court, Ponnani is the appellant in this Second Appeal. The appellant and respondents 2 to 7 herein constituted a Marumakathayam Thavazhi. The said Thavazhi was entitled to perform kazhakam services in Sree Dakshinamoorthy temple in Sivapuram. The first respondent who was a defendant in the suit is the trustee of the temple.

2. The appellant claimed that the thavazhi consisting of him self and respondents 2 to 7 was entitled to perform the kazhakam services in the temple for six months in a year and the wages due to the thavazhi was at the rate of ninety paras of paddy per year. The appellant had also taken assignment of the right of another thavazhy to perform the kazhakam services for a period of three months and thus the appellant claimed remuneration for the kazhakam services for a period of nine months in a year for the three years in question. The total amount claimed in the suit was Rs.1350/-. The suit was filed on 14-9-1977 by the appellant alone. The appellant claimed that in respect of the claim for six months he was entitled to claim on behalf of his thavazhy. In the suit an















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top