SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Ker) 285

Judges : PAREED PILLAY
Jose - Appellant
Versus
Registrar of Co-operative Societies - Respondent
Case No : O.P.NO.11342 of 1992
Decided On : 09/29/1992
Advocates Appeared :
N.P. Samuel For Petitioners Govt. Pleader (T.R. Ramachandran Nair) For Respondents

The amended bye-laws of a co-operative society, passed by the General Body, are binding on all members, including existing members, and govern membership rights and obligations.

Headnote:

Co-operative Society - Membership Rights - Interpretation of Bye-laws

Fact of the Case:

Petitioners, existing members of a co-operative society, challenged the requirement to pay an enhanced membership amount as per amended bye-laws in order to participate in the election to the Committee of the Society.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the amended bye-laws, which required existing members to pay an enhanced membership amount, were binding on all members of the society. The petitioners' contention that they were not liable to pay the enhanced amount was not accepted, and their challenge to the voters' list was dismissed.

Issues: Interpretation of bye-laws, Membership rights, Eligibility to participate in society elections

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the bye-laws of a co-operative society are binding on all members and cannot be ignored. It held that the amended bye-laws, passed by the General Body, govern all members, including existing members, and that the petitioners were bound by the requirement to pay the enhanced membership amount.

Final Decision: The Original Petition was dismissed, and no costs were awarded to the petitioners.

Judgment :-

Petitioners are A class members of Avinissery Powerloom Industrial Co-operative Society Limited registered under the Co-operative Societies Act, its activities being confined to Avinissery Panchayat. Petitioners became A Class members having paid Rs.100/- to the Society. Membership amount was later enhanced to Rs.5,000/- for A Class members as per amended Clause 4(a) of the byelaws of the Society. The amendment came into effect on 28-11-1987.

2. Administrator (3rd respondent) issued notice Ext.P-1 for election to the Committee of the Society. A draft list of voters was published-Petitioners and others filed objections. In the draft list names of the petitioners and 56 others were seen excluded. Contention of the petitioners is that without considering the objections original voters' list was published. The result of it is that only half of the original members are entitled to vote. Petitioners contend that the enhancement of the share in the Class A category has no application to them as they are already members of the Society.

3. The short question that arises for consideration is whether those who became members before the amendment are in any way bound to pay the enhanced amount. Counsel for the petitioners submitted that being members of the Society and having not been removed by any process of removal known to law they can take part in the election notwithstanding the amended bye-law whereby a member of the Society coming under the category of A Class has to take share worth Rs.8,000/-.

4. Learned Government Pleader pointed out that the byelaw came into force on 28-11-1987 when it was registered under S.13 of the Act and as it holds the field petitioners cannot just ignore it. According to him, the amended byelaw which has been passed by the General Body governs all members and it does not exempt the existing members from payment of the enhanced amount.

5. Rule 16 provides for the conditions to be complied with for admission for membership in a society. R.16(1)(c) provides that no person shall be admitted as a member of a society unless he has fulfilled all other conditions laid down in the Act, Rule and Byelaws. Clause 4(a) of the byelaws says that A Class member has to pay up the share amount by taking loan from the Government or other financial institutions. Amended Clause 7 states that every member should atleast take one share. There is nothing in the byelaws to indicate that Clause 4(a) will not apply to the existing members of the Society.

6. As it stands after amendment, a person who wants to become a member in the A Class will have to take a share of Rs.5,000/-. Clause 7 specifically mentions that at least one share should be taken by a member. R.28 states that no member of a society shall be eligible to vote at the meeting fixed for any election to the committee of that society, unless thirty days prior to the date of such meeting he acquires the number of shares for membership as may be provided in the bye-laws of the society of which he is a member. As amended Clause 4(a) of the bye-laws specifically mentions the share amount which one has to necessarily lake to become A Class member and as Clause 7 prescribes taking of at least one share, contention of the petitioners that they being already members of the Society are not bound by the amended provisions in the bye-laws is not tenable.

7. Bye-laws of a Co-operative Society cannot be relegated to secondary importance. So far as a society is concerned, the byelaws are in the nature of Article of Association of a company incorporated under the Companies Act (See Co-operative Central Bank v. Additional Industrial Tribunal (AIR 1970 SC 245)). Though they do not have the force of a statute, it is binding on all the members of the society. As the amendment has been effected only by the will of the General Body of the Society, the byelaws of the Society bind the petitioners. As Clause 7 specifically says that at least one share should be taken by a member and as

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top