KANIA, T.KOCHU THOMMEN, SAWANT
Harrisons Malayalam Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
1. A common question arises in all these cases. Are lands set apart in the estates in question for growing firewood trees such as eucalyptus or redgum to be used as fuel for the purpose of manufacturing rubber or tea in the smoke-houses or factories or for the personal use of the employees in the estates excluded from the definition of 'private forests' as contained in S.2(f) (1) (i) (B) of the Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971 (Act 26 of 1971) (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act')? The Kerala High Court in the three judgments, which are impugned in these appeals, held that such lands fell within the expression 'private forest' and accordingly vested in the State in terms of the Act. The High Court rejected the contention of the appellants to the contrary.
2. We shall now read S.2(f)(1)(i)(B):
"2. In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires.
(f) 'private forest' means (1) in relation to the Malabar district referred to in sub-section (2) of S.5 of the States Reorganisation Act, 1956 (Central Act 37 of 1956) -
(i) any land to which the Madras Preservation of Private Forests Act, 1949 (Madras Act XXVII of 1949), applied immediately before the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.