SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Ker) 245

JAGANNADHA RAO, KRISHNAMOORTHY
Bappu Haji – Appellant
Versus
Joint Registrar – Respondent


Judgment :-

Jagannadha Rao, CJ.

The appellant before us, Sri. AP Bappu Haji, has filed this appeal with leave, as he was not impleaded as a party in the writ petition. The writ petitioner, which is the Board of Directors of the Co-operative Bank in question, now figures as the first respondent in this appeal.

2. The point arising in this appeal touches upon certain aspects which have come up before a Division Bench of this Court in OP 1812 of 1992 (All Hassan v. State of Kerala and others) and batch dated 8-4-1992. The interpretation of S.28(1A) of the Kerala Cooperative Societies Act, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act) as introduced by Kerala Act 5 of 1992 and R.39 of the Rules also falls for consideration.

3. The facts of the case are as follows: The writ petition was filed by the President of the Board of Directors of the Co-operative Bank (hereinafter referred to as 'the Committee') which is a Society registered under the Co-operative Societies Act. As per Clause 33(c) of the bye-laws, the term of the Committee was to be five years from the date of election The present Committee is elected to office in the election held on 22-10-1989. Due to a stay order in regarding to th




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top