SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Ker) 210

SREEDHARAN
Chacko – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


Judgment :-

Petitioners, two in number, were Abkari contractors. First petitioner bid i auction certain arrack shops during the financial year 1982-83. He had respondents to 24 under his employment during that period. On expiry of his licence, he ceasa to have any connection whatsoever with the shop on 31-3-1983. Respondents 3 to 2 approached Labour Court, Kollam invoking the provisions under S.33C (2) of th Industrial Disputes Act claiming retrenchment compensation and notice pay. Their petition was entertained as C.P.7/1985. Labour Court allowed that petition and directs first petitioner herein to pay a sum of Rs.693/- each to respondents 3 to 24. The ton amount payable by the first petitioner comes to Rs.15, 246/-.

2. Second petitioner was the licensee of certain arrack shops during the Abkari year 1983-84. Respondents 3 to 14 were workers under him. On the expiry of the period of licence, second petitioner ceased to have any connection whatsoever with the shop" nth effect from 31-3-1984. Respondents 3 to 14 raised a contention that they were retrenched from service with effect from 1-4-1984 and that they are entitled to notice pay and retrenchment compensation. For getting this







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top