SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Ker) 152

KRISHNAMOORTHY, JAGANNADHA RAO
Koya – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


Judgment :-

Jagannadha Rao, C.J.

The first appellant was first petitioner in the writ petition, O.P.4771of 1988. The second writ petitioner in the writ petition was one P. Mohammed who died during the pendency of the writ petition. In his place, one Mohammed, S/o. Marakkar has come on record as a person Mutawalli nominated by the Managing Committee.

2. The dispute relates to the office of Mutawalli. The appellants claim by way of nomination by an elected Managing Committee. The respondents 3 and 4 claim as hereditary Mutawallies, as heirs of one Kunhirayan Ali.

3. The facts are as follows:-The father of the respondents 3 and 4, one Kunhirayan Ali, was functioning as the Mutawalli of the Wakf in question from 1972 after the demise of his father as per the terms of a Wakf Deed of 1939 (document 2156 of 1939). Now, after the demise of the said Kunhirayan Ali, his daughter and son (respondents 3 and 4) claimed to be the Mulawallies as per the registered deed executed by Kunhirayan Ali (deed No.431 of 1981) dated 17-8-1981.

4. Originally, the rival claimant to the above office of Mutawalli was one K.K.S. Kunhi Thangal. He was nominated by the Managing Committee of the Wakf. The Managing Com

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top