SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Ker) 121

SHAMSUDDIN
George – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


Judgment :-

In this Original Petition, Petitioner challenges Ext. P4 proceedings of Taluk Land Board, Quilandy.

2. As per the proceedings of the Taluk Land Board evidenced by Ext. P1 dated 18-12-1980; petitioner was directed to surrender 27.78 acres of land. Pursuant to this, petitioner surrendered the said exlent of land. More than 10 years after Ext. P1 order was passed, notice Ext. P2 was issued purporting to be under S.85(9A) of Kerala Land Reforms Act stating that the ceiling case was disposed of by proceedings dated 18-12-80, but on a further verification, it was seen that the decision taken by the Taluk Land Board was without proper verification of land and documentary evidence. It is further stated that an extent of 1.50 acres in R.S.2/3 and 2/5 of Keezhariyur Village was seen exempted under S.87 of Land Reforms Act being the water channel, and that there is no provision in the Act to exempt the water channel and therefore the Taluk Land Board purpose to issue show cause notice to re-open the case under S.85(9A) of K.L.R. Act as amended By Act 16/89. Pursuant to this, petitioner filed Ext. P3 objection, stating that channels will not come within the definition of land, that




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top