SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Ker) 374

PARIPOORNAN, K.A.NAYAR, JAGANNADHA RAO
Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


Judgment :-

K.A. Nayar, J.

The four tax revision cases were referred to the Full Bench doubting the correctness of the Division Bench decision reported in Dy. Commissioner of Sales tax v. Burmah Shell Co. Ltd., (1981) 48 STC 37 in the background of the subsequent Full Bench decision in Madras Rubber Factory Ltd. v. State of Kerala (1989 (1) KLT 827 = (1989) 74 STC 56) and the Supreme Court decision in McDowell & Co. Ltd. v. Commercial Tax Officer (1985) 59 STC 277. The facts of the case have been stated in the referring order.

2. The tax revision cases arose out of the common order passed by the Kerala Salestax Appellate Tribunal Additional Bench, Ernakulam. The first two cases related to the assessment years 1971-72 and 1972-73, and the other two cases related to the assessment years 1975-76 and 1976-77. The common question which arises for consideration is whether excise duty paid by the petitioner in respect of goods transferred outside the State of Kerala formed part of the purchase turnover liable to tax under S.SA of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act.

3. The assessee is an oil company dealing in petroleum products. The petroleum products in question were manufactured by Cochin Re






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top