SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Ker) 61

M.P.MENON
SUBRAMONIAN – Appellant
Versus
K. S. E. BOARD – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. "Manohar Clinic" belonging to the petitioner was originally classified as a consumer of electrical energy, appropriate to class I(c) of the Electricity Board's Tariff. Some time after an X-ray unit was installed in the clinic, the Officers of the Board re-classified it as Class IV(a). It appears that the petitioner filed some complaint before the Chief Electrical Inspector, and the matter was being got examined through the Electrical Inspector, Calicut. In the meanwhile, the petitioner filed OS. 641/79 before the Munsiff's Court of Kozhikode for a declaration that the demand for payment of electrical charges, with retrospective effect, on the basis of the reclassification, was illegal and of no effect. In I.A. No. 1302 of 1980 the petitioner wanted the court to appoint the Electrical Inspector, Calicut as a Commissioner in the suit for reporting about correct classification and the tariff applicable to his electrical connection, as also about the "voltage, connected load, horse power etc." The application was opposed by the Officials of the Electricity Board, but the court apparently thought that the dispute involved something in respect of which a report from an exp






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top