SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Ker) 98

BALAKRISHNA MENON
ITHAKKU ABRAHAM – Appellant
Versus
KBSAVAN DAMODARAN – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. This second appeal by a claimant under 0.21 R.58 CPC was admitted on the following question of law:

"Whether Ext.A2 partition is voidable at the instance of a subsequent creditor is the substantial question of law arising in the case."

2. The deceased 1st respondent instituted a suit OS 61/1971 against one Ithakku Joseph on 22-5-1971 for recovery of the principal and interest due under a promissory note for Rs.6500/-. The suit was decreed ex parte on 30-6-1971. The decree holder filed EP No. 146/1972 for sale of the judgment debtor's half share in 1.75 acres of land in various sub divisions of Sy. No. 86 attached before judgment in the suit. When the attached properties were brought to sale, the appellant preferred a claim under 0.21 R.58 of the CPC (as it then stood) contending that the properties attached and sought to be sold in execution of the decree do not belong to the judgment-debtor and had been separately allotted to the claimant in partition Ext.A2 dated 31-7-1967 between the claimant and the judgment debtor. The decree-holder opposed the claim contending that the partition Ext.A2 and a contemporaneous sale deed Ext.A3 conveying the properties allotted to th
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top