SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Ker) 122

BALAKRISHNA MENON
KUNJAPPAN – Appellant
Versus
TODDY WORKERS W. F. INSPECTOR – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. The two plaintiffs sued the defendants namely the Toddy Workers Welfare Fund Inspector, Ernakulam, the Tahsildar, Alwaye and the Village Officer, Malayattoor for an injunction to restrain them from resorting to revenue recovery proceedings for realisation of the contributions due from the plaintiffs towards the Toddy Workers Welfare Fund as adjudged by the 1st defendant as per his final order dated 30-6-1976 under S.8 of the Kerala Toddy Workers Welfare Fund Act, 1969 (the Act for short). The trial court dismissed the suit for the reason that there was no prayer to declare the final order of the 1st defendant as invalid and a mere injunction cannot be granted without a prayer either to set aside the final order or to declare it invalid. It is also found that the suit is not maintainable in the absence of notice under S.80 CPC. On the question of jurisdiction of the civil court to entertain a suit against the defendants the trial court held that the Act does not exclude the civil court's jurisdiction. On the above findings the suit was dismissed. The lower appellate court has confirmed the decree dismissing the suit on the ground that the suit for an injunction withou



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top