SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Ker) 46

G.VISWANATHA.IYER
RAJAN NAIR – Appellant
Versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. The petitioner is stated to be a junior lawyer of about six years vintage in the Kozhikode Bar. He was assessed to tax under the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act for short) for the assessment years 1984-85. As a junior lawyer, he does not have much of income. He had actually returned an income of Rs. 12,500/-from the profession, besides agricultural income of Rs 1,000/-. The Income Tax Officer completed the assessment on September 26, 1986, determining his total income at Rs. 1,39,770/- by making various additions. A copy of the order of assessment is Ext.P1. Consequent thereon, a total amount of Rs.71,817/- was demanded as income-tax and surcharge besides Rs.17,593/- by way of interest under S.13918 and Rs.24,950/- for interest under S.217(1)(b). The demand was thus for Rs 1,14,360/- in the aggregate.

2. Petitioner filed an appeal against this order before the second respondent, namely the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Kozhikode. A copy of the appeal is Ext.P2. It is dated 10-11-1986. Petitioner also filed an application before the second respondent praying for stay of collection of the tax pending the disposal of the appeal. He also appears to have moved the In





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top