SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Ker) 264

Judges : PARIPOORNAN,SREEDHARAN
DY.COMMR. - Appellant
Versus
PRAKASH TRADERS - Respondent
Case No : T.R.C. No. 84 of 1987
Decided On : 07/01/1987
Advocates Appeared :
Government Pleader; For Petitioner

The main legal point established in the judgment is that the classification of a substance as a pesticide under the relevant provisions of the Act determines its tax liability, and in this case, copper sulphate was deemed to be a pesticide and therefore exempt from tax.

Headnote:

Pesticide - Copper Sulphate - The court held that copper sulphate is a pesticide as specified in the 1st Schedule, entry 55 of the Act, and therefore the sales by the respondent are exempt from tax.

Fact of the Case:

The respondent, a dealer in copper sulphate, argued that his sales are not liable to be taxed as copper sulphate is a pesticide coming within entry 55 of the 1st Schedule. The Revenue assessed the turnover relating to copper sulphate in the hands of the respondent, which was confirmed in appeal. The Appellate Tribunal accepted the plea of the respondent, leading to the Revenue filing a revision.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that copper sulphate is a pesticide as specified in the 1st Schedule, entry 55 of the Act, and therefore the sales by the respondent are exempt from tax. The court dismissed the revision filed by the Revenue.

Issues: The main issue was whether copper sulphate is considered a pesticide under the relevant provisions of the Act, and whether the sales by the respondent are exempt from tax.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the definition of pesticide and insecticide, as well as the order issued by the Government of Kerala, to determine that copper sulphate is indeed a pesticide as specified in the 1st Schedule, entry 55 of the Act.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the revision filed by the Revenue, affirming the decision of the Appellate Tribunal that the sales of copper sulphate by the respondent are exempt from tax.

Judgment :-

1. The Revenue is the petitioner herein. The respondent is a dealer in copper sulphate and so his sales are not liable to be taxed. Under item.55 of the 1st Schedule pesticides and plant protection chemicals were taxable at the relevant time at the point of first sale in the State by a dealer who is liable to tax under S.5 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act (in short the Act) at 4 per cent. According to the respondent, copper sulphate is a pesticide coming within entry.55 of the Ist Schedule. Notwithstanding the said plea, the turnover relating to copper-sulphate was assessed in the hands of the 2nd respondent. The assessment was confirmed in appeal. The Appellate Tribunal accepted the plea of the respondent that copper sulphate is a pesticide coming within Schedule.1, entry.55 of the Act as it stood at the relevant period, and the sales by the respondent being the second sale, it is exempt from tax. The Revenue has come up in revision.

2. We heard counsel for the Revenue Mr. Nambiar. It was argued that the Appellate Tribunal was in error in holding that copper sulphate is a pesticide and that the second sale of copper sulphate by the respondent-assessee is not liable to be taxed. We are unable to agree. A pesticide is a substance for killing pests. It is a substance used to destroy plant or animal that is harmful to man.

"Pesticides are classified according to the type of organisms they attack; for example, substances that kill insects are known as insecticides; agents that kill fungi are known as fungicides."

(Encyclopedia Americana, Vol. 21, p. 655)

As per S.3(e) of the Insecticides Act, 1968, insecticide is defined to include any substance specified in the Schedule. Copper-sulphate is an item listed in the Schedule for the purpose of S.3(e) of the Act. The Appellate Tribunal has also stated that the order issued by the Government of Kerala, Taxes (B) Department, No. GO Rt. 443/83/TD. dated 15-7-1981, has clarified that all insecticides are pesticides. In the Random House Dictionary of the English Language, copper-sulphate has been specified at page 322 as: "blue vitriol". At page 163 of the Dictionary 'blue vitriol' has been specified as:

"a salt occurring in large transparent, deep-blue triclinic crystals, appearing in its anhydrous state as a white powder: used chiefly as a mordant, insecticide, fungicide, and in engraving. Also called blue copperas, blue stone, copper sulfate, cupric sulfate."

In the light of the above, we have no hesitation to bold that the Appellate Tribunal was justified in holding that copper sulphate is a pesticide as specified in Ist Schedule, entry 55 of the Act. On this basis, the 2nd sales by the respondent will be eligible for exemption. The Appellate Tribunal was justified in holding so.

No interference is called for with the decision of the Appellate Tribunal. This revision is without merit. It is dismissed in limine.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top