BALAKRISHNA MENON, SHAMSUDDIN
MANICK PETER – Appellant
Versus
SURENDRANATHAN – Respondent
1. This appeal by the defendants is against the dismissal of their application to set aside the exparte decree passed in the suit. The suit is for recovery of Rs. 32,000/ with interest on the basis of six promissory notes executed by the defendants in favour of the plaintiff. The defendants were duly served with summons in the suit. All the defendants entered appearance on 29-6-1984. No written statement was filed on 6-7-1984 the date fixed for the first hearing of the suit as required by 0.8 R.1 CPC. The defendants applied for time for filing written statement and the court on 6-7-1984 granted them time till 6-8-1984. The defendants on 6-8-1984 prayed for further time and the court granted time till 19-9-1984 for the defendants to file their written statement. The case was posted to 19-9-1984. No written statement filed even on 19-9-1984. The defendants and their counsel were absent and the court on the same day pronounced judgment under 0.8 R.10 CPC decreeing the suit as prayed for on the basis of Exts. Al to A8 marked and proved by affidavit of the plaintiff.
2. An application to set aside the exparte decree was filed on 25-9-1984 supported by an affidavit by the coun
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.