SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Ker) 410

SANKARAN NAIR
Janardhanan – Appellant
Versus
Bindu Purushothaman – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. Petitioner who describes himself as a Director of 'Loka Chalanam Janakiya Sangham', challenges an order of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Ernakulam, dismissing the complaint in CC No. 8/1983.

2. Out of his eagerness to maintain purity in public life, petitioner says be filed the complaint, suspecting that the first respondent-daughter of the second respondent-secured admission to a Medical College without the minimum marks required, by forging a marklist. Offences under S.465, 466, 478, 471 and 472 read with S.109 IPC were alleged. First respondent passed her Pre-Degree Examination in the year 1977

with Reg. No. 84524. According to petitioner, she secured below 50 percent in Science subjects, 50 per cent being the minimum marks for seeking admission to Medical Colleges. Respondents are alleged to have altered the marks in the certificate, thus dishonestly and fraudulently making a document and using it as genuine. Complaint is unique by absence of averments of facts. It is not stated how, or when or in what manner, this was done. Paragragh.5 of the complaint only states that the offence committed by the accused would be proved, if the consolidated marklist fo












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top