SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Ker) 125

PARIPOORNAN, G.VISWANATHA.IYER
MOIDEENKUTTY HAJI – Appellant
Versus
MUHAMMEDAU – Respondent


Judgment :-

Viswanatha Iyer, J

This appeal is filed by the defendant in O.S. No. 20 of 1981 on the file of the Subordinate Judge's Court of Tirur. The suit was one for recovery of possession of the property scheduled to the plaint with arrears of rent, after removing, at the defendant's expense, the structures and sawmill erected by the defendant on the property, and restoring the same to its previous condition; and if that were not permissible for any reason, to ascertain the value of the improvements made by the defendant and to direct surrender of possession to the plaintiff on depositing the a mount for payment to the defendant.

2. The plaintiff is the owner of the plaint schedule property. It was entrusted to the defendant on 1-12-1970 on a monthly rent of Rs. 100/-. The entrustment was for the purpose of the defendant's business of establishing and running a saw mill in the premises. The term of the lease was three years. At the end of the said period, the defendant was to vacate and surrender possession after removing the structures and saw mill at his expense or after being paid the value of the improvements as determined by mediators, without any demur or objection. If, how




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top