SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Ker) 431

G.VISWANATHA.IYER
PATEL VENEERS (P) LTD. – Appellant
Versus
REGIONAL P. P. COMMISSIONER – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. Ext. P-3 is an order of the first respondent Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Trivandrum by which he has treated the establishments of the petitioner and respondents 2 and 3 as inter-related composite units, liable to be clubbed together for the purpose of applying the provisions of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, XIX of 1952, (the Act). The case of the petitioner and of respondents 2 and 3 was that they were each employing only less than the number of persons, which will bring them within the coverage envisaged by S.1 (3) of the Act. The first respondent has, for the reasons stated by him, held that the three establishments are inter-related, liable to be clubbed together and therefore, liable to be covered by the Act as one establishment. Ext. P-3 is challenged on various grounds mentioned in the Original Petition. The question to be decided is whether the three establishments are separate and independent or whether they constitute units of the same establishment for purposes of the Act.

2. Counsel for the petitioner contended that there is no adequate alternate remedy available to the petitioner in law to challenge the proceedin




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top