SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Ker) 35

MALIMATH, SUKUMARAN
AGRL. INCOMETAX OFFICER – Appellant
Versus
THANKAMMA PARAMESWARAN – Respondent


Judgment :-

Sukumaran, J.

The two writ appeals are at the instance of the State Government and its officials. They question the correctness of the judgment in the two writ petitions-O.P. Nos. 2925 & 2929 of 1979-whereunder the learned judge quashed the revenue sale of the property of the two petitioners. The reason as given by the learned judge for nullifying the revenue sale is that the writ petitioners had become the owners of the property at the time when the revenue sale was actually conducted, that the properties did not therefore belong to the defaulter at (he time of the sale and that the revenue sale without reckoning the earlier private sale in favour of the petitioners was void.

2 The correctness of the reason so given has to be adjudged in the light of the facts and the provisions of the Kerala Revenue Recovery Act, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as 'The Act') particularly S.44 thereof.

3. We shall, at the outset, set out the relevant brief facts. The properties originally belonged to one A. P. Ramaswamy Gounder. He was an assessee to agricultural income-tax. Demands made for payment of the tax to the extent of Rs. 30,563.29 remained un responded to and the dues thus remain































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top