SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Ker) 56

PADMANABHAN, BALAKRISHNAN
KUTTIKRISHNAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. Appellants are accused 1 to 3 in Sessions Case 32 of 1983 on the file of the Sessions Judge, Palghat. They were convicted for an offence punishable under S.302 read with S.34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to imprisonment for life.

2. The prosecution case may be summarised thus: Accused 1 and 3 are the sons and 2nd accused is their aged mother. 1st accused married deceased Pankajam about 7 years prior to the incident which took place on 3-10-1982. Two children were born out of the wed-lock. The last child was born 15 days before the incident and it died shortly after birth. Pankajam was the daughter of P.W.7, a retired Sub Inspector of Police in Tamil Nadu. He is none other than the brother of the 2nd accused. At the time of marriage he gave twenty sovereigns of gold ornaments to Pankajam. Out of this he got back 15 sovereigns subsequently. Since P.W.7 did not return the ornaments the accused persuaded the deceased in vain to get them back. It was the helplessness or rather indifference of the deceased in getting back the ornaments that motivated accused to murder her.

3. In furtherance of their common intention, the mother and her two sons, decided to kill her




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top