SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Ker) 7

JOHN MATHEW
SUBAIDA – Appellant
Versus
KRISHNAN – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. The common revision petitioner in these two C.R.Ps. is the landlord of a line building having three apartments. The respondents herein are the tenants of two of such apartments. The landlord filed separate petitions for eviction of these tenants on two grounds, namely, (1) for her own occupation and (2) arrears of rent. All the authorities below held against her on ground No.l and eviction was ordered only on the second ground.

2. Rent Control Petition No. 186 of 1978, before the Rent Controller, Cannanore, from which C.R.P.No.3626 of 1981 arises is in respect of room No.516. That Rent Control Petition was disposed of on 11th December, 1978. While discussing the question of bona fide need of the landlord the Rent Control Court observed that the landlord herself has not given evidence and only her husband is examined as P.W.1. The Rent Control Court treated this as an important circumstance against the landlord. Another ground on which the Rent Control Court rejected the ground of bona fide need of the landlord, is that there was a prior Rent Control Petition for eviction of the third apartment in this line building. Although by Ext.A-6 order eviction was allowed, that
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top