JOHN MATHEW
SUBAIDA – Appellant
Versus
KRISHNAN – Respondent
1. The common revision petitioner in these two C.R.Ps. is the landlord of a line building having three apartments. The respondents herein are the tenants of two of such apartments. The landlord filed separate petitions for eviction of these tenants on two grounds, namely, (1) for her own occupation and (2) arrears of rent. All the authorities below held against her on ground No.l and eviction was ordered only on the second ground.
2. Rent Control Petition No. 186 of 1978, before the Rent Controller, Cannanore, from which C.R.P.No.3626 of 1981 arises is in respect of room No.516. That Rent Control Petition was disposed of on 11th December, 1978. While discussing the question of bona fide need of the landlord the Rent Control Court observed that the landlord herself has not given evidence and only her husband is examined as P.W.1. The Rent Control Court treated this as an important circumstance against the landlord. Another ground on which the Rent Control Court rejected the ground of bona fide need of the landlord, is that there was a prior Rent Control Petition for eviction of the third apartment in this line building. Although by Ext.A-6 order eviction was allowed, that
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.