SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Ker) 340

THOMAS
JAYADEVA PANICKER – Appellant
Versus
VELAYUDHAN – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. A complainant in a criminal case sought the assistance of the court to get a document searched out from the custody of one of the accused. The court declined to extend its assistance to the complainant. Hence that complainant has approached this Court with a petition under S.482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short "the Code"). The complainant will be referred to hereinafter as the petitioner.

2. The petitioner filed the complaint against ten persons, accusing them of different offences and the learned Magistrate took cognizance of the offences under S.463, 464 and 471 read with S.34 of the I.P.C. The allegations in the complaint are not relevant for consideration at this stage, and hence I do not narrate them here. During the pendency of the case the petitioner filed an application for giving a direction to the Assistant Registrar of a Co-operative Society (for short 'Society') to produce some records. Pursuant to the summons issued to the said Assistant Registrar, he appeared in court and submitted that the required records are not within his powers and control. Thereafter, the petitioner filed the second application praying for the issue of a search warrant











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top