VARGHESE KALLIATH
SANTHA – Appellant
Versus
RAJAPPAN PILLAI – Respondent
1. Plaintiff filed a suit on a promissory note for the recovery of an amount of Rs. 1150/-. The defendant contended that he has not executed any promissory note. Further he said that there were some transactions between the plaintiff and the defendant and in connection with these transactions, some papers stamped and signed were given to the plaintiff. I may at once say that in the written statement, the defendant said only that some papers with stamps affixed were given but did not say that those papers contained his signature. His case is that the plaintiff fabricated a promissory note in one of these papers given by him. In evidence the defendant said that the alleged promissory note was not executed by him and that he has given blank papers stamped and signed for the purpose of some other transaction between himself and the plaintiff.
2. The trial court, after considering the evidence, found that the promissory note was not genuine and dismissed the suit. The appellate court, after a re-appraisal of the evidence, did not agree with the trial court. It decreed the suit. Now the defendant files this civil revision petition.
3. The learned counsel for the revision petiti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.