Judges : PARIPOORNAN,THOMAS
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD - Appellant
Versus
KAMALAKSITY AMMA - Respondent
Case No : A.S. No. 301 of 1986
Decided On : 09/05/1986
Advocates Appeared :
N. Viswanatha Iyer; For Appellant
Negligence - Electric Line Maintenance - Indian Evidence Act, S.114 - Scott v. London and St. Katherine Docks Co. - Syad Akbar v. State of Karnataka - Res Ipsa Loquitur - Quantum of Damages - G. K. S. Iyer v. T.K. Nair - British Transport Commission v. Gourley - Raimand Augustine v. Ludvic & others - Cookson v. Knowles - Kunjamma v. Geeverghese - Jaimal Singh v. Jawala Devi - Fall in Rupee Value
Fact of the Case:
Krishnan Nair, a member of the Piravom Panchayat, was electrocuted by a live wire maintained by the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB). His family sued KSEB for damages due to negligence in maintaining the electric line. The trial court found KSEB negligent and awarded damages, which KSEB appealed.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that Krishnan Nair was electrocuted due to the negligence of KSEB in maintaining the electric line. The court also upheld the quantum of damages awarded by the trial court.
Issues: The main issue was whether KSEB was negligent in maintaining the electric line, leading to Krishnan Nair's death. Another issue was the quantum of damages awarded by the trial court.
Ratio Decidendi: The court applied the principle of res ipsa loquitur, which creates a presumption of negligence when a pedestrian is electrocuted from a live wire. The court also considered the quantum of damages, relying on previous case law and recognizing the practical difficulties in assessing such damages.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the appeal and upheld the trial court's decision, finding KSEB negligent and affirming the quantum of damages awarded.
1. One Krishnan Nair alias Appu Nair was a member of the Piravom Panchayat. He left his house during the early hours on 13-12-1982 to have a dip in a nearby canal, without any premonition that he would be entrapped by the death warrant so imminently. A live wire, snapped out of the cup joint on an electric post, was lying on the road and Krishnan Nair accidentally came across with the live wire and he slumped down and breathed his last. Thus his life was snuffed in a trice. His aged mother, his widow and children initiated action against the Kerala State Electricity Board (for short the KSEB.) for damages on account of his death, alleging that the K S E B. was negligent in maintaining the electric line under their management on the route concerned. The trial court accepted the case and gave a decree for Rs. 75,000/-with interest and costs. The KSEB., aggrieved by the aforesaid decree, has filed this appeal.
2. The plaint averments show that Krishnan Nair was a man of good health, doing business in textiles, provisions and general goods, besides running a rice mill, and was earning fairly good income with which the members of his family were getting on well and his five children were prosecuting their studies. He was electrocuted some time soon after 5.30 a.m. on 13-12-1982 when be was going for a bath in the Lift Irrigation Canal situated nearby. The electric wire got snapped from the cup joint due to lack of proper care and maintenance. Thus the plaintiff claimed damages from the KSEB. on the ground of negligence on the part of the latter who was in charge of the control and management of the power supply in the route concerned. According to the plaintiffs, the deceased was getting an average of Rs. 1,000/-per month besides Rs. 75/-per month as sitting fee being a member of the Panchayat. The entire family was depending on the deceased for the livelihood of its members and for the educational expenses of the children. Hence, the claim for Rs. 75,000/- was made in the plaint.
3. In the written statement, the K S E B. admitted that Krishnan Nair died at the time and on the date alleged, but they denied that he was electrocuted. They also denied negligence on their part and claimed that the electric installations under their management were regularly and properly maintained, adopting all safety methods and precautionary measures. According to the KSEB. Krishnan Nair did not have any income at all and he was only "an unemployed politician". The amount of damages claimed is highly exorbitant and inflated, contended the KSEB.
4. The learned Sub Judge came to the conclusion that Krishnan Nair was electrocuted at the place and time alleged in the plaint, and the KSEB. was negligent in maintaining the electric line on the route. The learned Sub Judge found that Krishnan Nair was earning a good income from his business in different fields. His life expectancy was estimated to be 75 years approximately. The quantum of damages due to the plaintiffs was assessed to be Rs. 84,850/-, but as the claim was only for Rs. 75,000/-, a decree in that sum was granted.
5. Learned counsel for the KSEB. contended that the court below went wrong in holding that the KSEB. was negligent in maintaining the electric line in good repair and that the quantum of damages has been arbitrarily fixed without norms or principles.
6. We obtained the records from the court below and heard the counsel again at length on the points urged by him. On a consideration of the entire facts and circumstances of this case, in the light of the arguments addressed by the learned counsel for the appellant, we do not consider this a fit case where notice to the respondents should be issued.
7. That Krishnan Nair died during early morning on 13-12-1982 is common case. pw. 3, a teacher of the local Government High School, has given evidence that he was the first to see Krishnan Nair lying on a live electric wire on the road and that he rushed to a lineman and got the electric
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.