1. The tenants are the revision petitioners. The landlord is same in all these petitions.

2. The applications of the landlord under S.11(2) and (3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, for short The Rent Control Act, were dismissed by the Rent Control Court. On appeal the appellate authority reversed the orders and allowed the petitions. In the meantime there was a relinquishment of possession of rooms by two tenants and taking over possession by the landlord.

3. The revisional authority has concurred with the findings of the appellate authority and as a result of which the revisions, the tenants had filed under S.20 of the Rent Control Act, were dismissed. These revisions challenging the said orders of the Revisional Authority under S.20, have been filed by those tenants.

4. The facts which are relevant and requisite to consider the questions arising for consideration in these revision petitions, briefly stated are: The petitions for eviction are brought under S.11(3). That means the landlord has prayed for an order directing the petitioners-tenants, to put him in possession of the building in question, as he bonafide needs the same for his own occupation