SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Ker) 404

T.KOCHU THOMMEN, BALAKRISHNAN
K. S. E. BOARD – Appellant
Versus
SUNDARAM ESTATE – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. The Kerala State Electricity Board (the "Board") is the appellant. It challenges the order of the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation (the "Commissioner") in W. C. C. No. 19 of 1980 holding that the first respondent, the employer, was liable to pay the workman (the second respondent in this appeal) a sum of Rs. 18,816/- as compensation under S.4(c) read with S.3 and Part.2 of Schedule.1 and Schedule.4 of the Workmen's. Compensation Act, 1923 (the "Act") and that the employer was to that extent entitled to be indemnified by the Board. This order is challenged only in so far as the Board has been held liable to indemnify the employer.

2. Appearing for the Board, Shri. K. P. G. Menon challenges the jurisdiction of the Commissioner. He contends that the alleged right of the employer to be indemnified by a stranger like the Board is a matter for determination by a civil court, and not by recourse to the summary procedure under S.12(2) of the Act. He, however, submits that the finding of the Commissioner that the injury was caused to the employee by an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment and that the employer was liable to compensate him in the s





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top