SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Ker) 414

MALIMATH, BHASKARAN NAMBIAR
ASOKAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. In response to the notification issued by the Public Service Commission for the post of Boat Lascars, the petitioners submitted their applications but they were not called for interview. Therefore they approached this Court with this Original Petition and obtained an ad interim order directing the Public Service Commission to interview them subject to the final decision in the case. Accordingly they were duly interviewed. The rank list consisting of about 299 candidates already made on the 28th of February, 1982 had a life of two years. In pursuance of the interim direction made by this Court after the petitioners were interviewed, petitioners 4, 5,6, 8 and 9 were included in the rank list subject to the final decision in the original petition. Petitioners 1 to 3 and 7 were not even provisionally selected for inclusion in the rank list. Hence it is obvious that their cases do not deserve any further consideration.

2. So far as petitioners 4, 5, 6, 8 and 9 are concerned, it is obvious that if they were suo motu called for interview by the Public Service Commission they would have got themselves included in the rank list. Mr. Kelu Nambiar, learned counsel appearing for




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top