MALIMATH, BHASKARAN NAMBIAR
ASOKAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
1. In response to the notification issued by the Public Service Commission for the post of Boat Lascars, the petitioners submitted their applications but they were not called for interview. Therefore they approached this Court with this Original Petition and obtained an ad interim order directing the Public Service Commission to interview them subject to the final decision in the case. Accordingly they were duly interviewed. The rank list consisting of about 299 candidates already made on the 28th of February, 1982 had a life of two years. In pursuance of the interim direction made by this Court after the petitioners were interviewed, petitioners 4, 5,6, 8 and 9 were included in the rank list subject to the final decision in the original petition. Petitioners 1 to 3 and 7 were not even provisionally selected for inclusion in the rank list. Hence it is obvious that their cases do not deserve any further consideration.
2. So far as petitioners 4, 5, 6, 8 and 9 are concerned, it is obvious that if they were suo motu called for interview by the Public Service Commission they would have got themselves included in the rank list. Mr. Kelu Nambiar, learned counsel appearing for
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.