SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Ker) 52

BALAKRISHNA MENON, VARGHESE KALLIATH, BHASKARAN NAMBIAR
K. KRISHNANKU ITY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. Some of the Hindu Members of the Kerala Legislative Assembly challenge "The Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions (Amendment) Ordinance, 1984"-in short the Ordinance-under which every Hindu member of the Legislative Assembly of this State who intends to participate in the election of one member to the Travancore Devaswom Board is compelled to file a declaration signed by him "to the effect that he believes in God and professes the Hindu religion".

2. The Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act, 1950 (Act XV of 1950) was enacted to make provision "for the administration, supervision, and control of incorporated and unincorporated Devaswom and other Hindu Religious Endowments and Funds", of the Travancore, Cochin areas. The Act provides for the vesting of the administration of the Devaswoms in Devaswom Boards, one for the Travancore and another for the Cochin areas and the provisions in respect of the two Devaswoms are practically the same. We are here concerned only with Travancore Devaswom Board, in short, the Board. Under S.3 of the Act:

"The administration of incorporated and unincorponed Devaswoms and of Hindu Religious Endowments and all their p



































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top