SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Ker) 56

K.P.RADHAKRISHNA MENON
T. A. Rajendran – Appellant
Versus
P. – Respondent


Judgment :-

The Advocate General for the State is appointed by the Governor in exercise of the powers conferred on him under Clause (1) of Art. 165 of the Constitution. Clause (2) of Art. 165 provides that it shall be the duty of the Advocate General to give advice to the Government upon such legal matters, and to perform such other duties of a legal character as may from time to time be referred or assigned to him by the Governor, and to discharge the functions conferred on him by or under the Constitution or any other law for the time being in force.

2. In pursuance of the above power under Cls. (2) and (3) of Art. 165, the Government of Kerala has made "the Rules" regarding the duties, remuneration etc. of the Advocate General, contained in the Notification, No. LD(A)1-3006/56/Law, dt. 1st November 1956. Clause 18 of the Rules stipulates that the Advocate General is bound to perform such other duties of a legal character as may, from time to time, be referred or assigned to him by the Governor.

3. Pursuant to the power conferred by Clause 18 (referred to above) of the Rules, the Governor has directed the Advocate General Sri. P. V. Ayyappan to "appear and defend C.C. No. 18/85 o






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top