SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Ker) 64

S.PADMANABHAN
Konath Madhavi Amma – Appellant
Versus
S. M. Sherief – Respondent


Judgment :-

The appeal is by the complainant in C.C. No. 613 of 1977 on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ernakulam and it is directed against the judgment dt. 30-5-1980 dismissing the private complaint filed for offences punishable under Ss. 500 and 501 of the Indian Penal Code. The respondent-accused is the Editor, Printer and Publisher of a daily newspaper by name "Geetha", published from Ernakulam. Exts. P1, P2 and P3 are respectively the publications made by him in the issues of his paper dt. 2-1-1977, 10-4-1977 and 21-8-1977. The complainant's case is that these publications are defamatory to her and her daughter, in having openly attacked their conduct especially morality. The learned Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused.

2. The main question arising in this appeal is whether the complaint is fatally defective inasmuch as it has not disclosed the allegations which specifically constituted the imputations affecting the reputation of the complainant and her daughter.

3. Exts. P1 to P4 were marked on the side of the complainant. Of them Exts. P1 to P3 are the impugned publications and Ext. P4 is a postal receipt for having issued notice to the accused. Pws.




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top