Judges : T.KOCHU THOMMEN,PAREED PILLAY
BAR COUNCIL OF KERALA - Appellant
Versus
THANKAPPAN PILLAI - Respondent
Case No : O.P. No. 2060 of 1984
Decided On : 07/30/1985
Advocates Appeared :
V.R. Venkitakrishnan; N.C. Joseph; K.T. Sankaran; For Petitioner S. Easwara Iyer; E. Subramoni; K. Radhakrishnan; C. K.S. Panicker; For Respondents
Reference Order - Judicial Power - The court clarified that a reference order under S.3 of the Kerala High Court Act, 1958 must be a judicial order in writing and signed by the Single Judge, and not merely an oral direction or an endorsement by the Court Officer.
Fact of the Case:
The case was initially posted before a Single Judge, then before a Division Bench, and later before the First Bench, but was not dealt with on the merits. The Court Officer made an endorsement for the case to be posted before another bench, assuming it had been referred by the Single Judge under S.3 of the Act.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the case had not been referred to a Division Bench as required under S.3 of the Act, and the initial endorsement by the Court Officer did not constitute a reference order. The matter was directed to be placed before the Single Judge for appropriate orders.
Issues: The issues involved the interpretation of the requirements for a reference order under S.3 of the Kerala High Court Act, 1958 and the authority to adjourn matters for being heard and determined by a Division Bench.
Ratio Decidendi: The court clarified that a reference order under S.3 must be a judicial order in writing and signed by the Single Judge, and that the discretion to adjourn matters specified under S.3 for a Division Bench lies with the Single Judge.
Final Decision: The case was directed to be placed before the learned Single Judge for appropriate orders.
1. This case stood posted before the learned Single Judge on 11-1-1985. The Court Officer on that day made the following endorsement on the docket: "Post before a Division Bench on Monday. B/o. Sd/-". The matter was later posted before the First Bench on 1-3-1985. on 12-4-1985. and finally on 25-7-1985. The First Bench. however. did not deal with the matter on the merits. Another endorsement was made on the docket by the Court Officer on 25-7-1985: "Post before C XII on 29-7-1985 at the top of list. B/o. Sd/-". The character of the latter endorsement is not quite clear to us. but perhaps it was based on an administrative direction of the learned Chief Justice presumably on the assumption that the case had already been referred by the learned Single Judge under S.3 of the Kerala High Court Act. 1958.
2. This is how this case has come up before us. This case. we notice. has not been referred to a Division Bench in terms of S.3. The first endorsement made by the Court Officer on 11-1-1985 is not a reference order as postulated under S.3 of the Act. The endorsement merely shows that an oral direction to that effect had been given by the learned Single Judge. No such oral direction. or an endorsement of the Court Officer evidencing it. constitutes an order of reference under S.3. What is postulated under that Section is a judicial order which has to be in writing and signed by the Single Judge himself. S.3 says:
"3. Powers of Single Judge. The powers of the High Court in relation to the following matters may be exercised by a Single Judge. provided that the judge before whom the matter is posted for hearing may adjourn it for being heard and determined by a Bench of two judges:
3. S.4 of the Act says:
"4. Powers of a bench of two Judges. The powers of the High Court in relation to the following matters may be exercised by a beach of two Judges.
(1) Any matter in respect of which the powers of the High Court can be exercised by a Single Judge.
This Section confers power on the Division Bench to hear any matter in respect of which the powers of this High Court can be exercised by a Single Judge. A Single Judge has indeed the discretion to adjourn any matter specified under S.3 for being heard and determined by a Division Bench. Although. as a Division Bench. we have the power to hear and determine an Original Petition filed under Art.226 of the Constitution. being one of the matters specified under S.3. such petition must be brought to us by means of a judicial order signed by the judge himself as postulated under S.3. This matter has not been so brought to us.
4. Accordingly. place the Original Petition before the learned Single Judge for appropriate orders.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.