SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Ker) 140

PAREED PILLAY
ABU BACKER – Appellant
Versus
JOHN – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. Revision petitioner is the respondent in I.A. 1146/1979 in O.S. 238/1978 of the Sub Court, Palghat. The respondent herein filed the petition under 0.9 R.13 C..P.C. to set aside the ex-parte decree passed against him. The lower court allowed the petition.

2. Revision petitioner filed the suit to recover Rs. 10,000/- as damages alleging that the respondent forcibly and illegally took him to unlawful custody and detained him in the police station.. At the instance of the respondent the case was transferred from the Sub Court Badagara to the Sub Court Palghat where it is numbered as O.S. 238/1978. The case of the petitioner is that summons was taken to the respondent several times, that he purposely evaded it, that substituted service was ordered by the court, that publication was effected in'Mathrubhumi' dated 25-2-1979, that he did not enter appearance in the court and that the suit was decreed on 22-3-1979. The learned counsel for the revision petitioner submitted that the trial court was not at all justified in allowing the petition as admittedly paper publication was effected as per court order. Learned counsel for the respondent contended that the court had ordered





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top