JOHN MATHEW
A. A. JOSEPH – Appellant
Versus
VARGHESE GEORGE – Respondent
1. The additional decree-holder is the revision petitioner, who is hereinafter referred to as 'the decree-holder'. He challenges an order dismissing his petition to set aside a court sale under Order XXI R.91 of the Code of Civil Procedure. We are now concerned only with item 2 of the properties sold in court auction which is hereinafter referred to as 'the property'. The property was attached on 19-8-1968. It was purchased by the decree-holder in the court sale conducted on 16-3-1970 for an amount of Rs. 10848.72. After confirmation of sale delivery was effected on 6-11-1970. Respondents 12 to 14 before the lower court filed a petition for re-delivery on 25-11-1970. The decree-holder received notice of this petition on 154-197I. He filed E. A. No. 128/71 under Order XXI R.91 CPC. to set aside the sale on 16-1-1971. Defendants 4 to 13 who were the owners of the property had sold it to respondents 12 to 14 before the lower court by registered sale deed dated 18-5-1966, namely before the date of attachment. Therefore the decree-holder alleged that the judgment-debtors had no saleable interest in the property and on that basis the application to set aside the sale was file
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.