SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Ker) 306

M.P.MENON
LEELAVATHI – Appellant
Versus
CHIEF REGIONAL MANAGER – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. It is not suggested that any notification under S.14(2) of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 (Central Act 13/85) has so far been issued, and the admissibility of this writ petition has therefore to be considered on merits.

2. The petitioner is a clerk in the State Bank of India and claims to be sufficiently senior to be considered for appointment as an officer in the Junior Management Scale Grade I (hereinafter called 'JMO') in the Kerala Regional Offices of the Bank. Under rules governing the matter, such appointments are to be made by promotion from among the seniormost clerical staff by selection on the basis of tests periodically conducted. During the last test, only clerks who had commenced service prior to June, 1974 were promoted, and the next test was due to be held in April, 1985. The petitioner was expecting to participate in that test and to compete for promotion; but in the meanwhile, the Bank of Cochin Ltd. was amalgamated with the State Bank of India in accordance with a scheme prepared by the Reserve Bank and sanctioned by the Central Government under the provisions of S. 45 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. The scheme provided for absorption of




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top