SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Ker) 258

U.L.BHAT, PAREED PILLAY
PATHU – Appellant
Versus
MAMMAD – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. learned single judge of this Court has referred these cases to Division Bench "to resolve the apparent conflict between the decision by Eradi J. in 1974 K.L.T. 286 and Poti J. in 1980 K.L.T. 854" and in view of the fact that "the decision by Eradi J. is seen doubted by a Division Bench of this Court in A.S.A. No.3 of 1971 (1974 K.L.T. S.N. 23)".

2. Revision petitioner in the C.R.P. is the first respondent in the second appeal. First appellant in the second appeal daughter of Ibrayi, filed a suit O.S.257 of 1964 in the Munsiff's Court, Payyoli for partition and separation of her 7/72 share in the suit property on the allegation that the property belonged to her deceased father Ibrayi and on his death, she has inherited a share. She also challenged registered lease deed (Ext.B7) marked in the suit executed by her brother, third defendant, in favour of her brother-in-law, 7th defendant and contended that she is entitled to partition free from the claims under the lease deed. Second defendant is the widow, defendants 3.4 and 6 are sons and plaintiff and defendants 1 and 5 are daughters of Ibrayi. Third defendant remained exparte in the suit. Defendants 1,2 and 4 to 6 supp



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top