PARIPOORNAN
VINODAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
1. The petitioner is doing business in coconuts at Mahe, Pondicherry State. He is a registered dealer at Pondicherry, Exts. P1 and P2 are Certificates of Registration under the Pondicherry General Sales Tax Act and Central Sales Tax Rules respectively. His turnover was determined by the Mahe authorities as evidenced by Ext. P3. He used to purchase coconuts from Mahe and send them to outside the State in lorry loads. He did so on 20-3-1982. The sale bill and delivery note accompanied the transport (Exts. P4 and P5). The Intelligence Officer, Sales fax Department suspected the genuineness of the transport and in exercise of the powers vested in him under S.29-A of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act and R.35-A of the Kerala General Sales Tax Rules initiated proceedings, evidenced by Exts. P10 to P12. The petitioner, offered security, evidenced by Exts. P13 to P15. In this Original Petition the petitioner assails Exts.10, P11 and P12 proceedings. He contends that S.29-A of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act and also R.35-A of the Kerala General Sales Tax Rules are unconstitutional, void and inoperative. There is a prayer to quash Exts. P10, P11 and P12. Other reliefs are also p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.