SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Ker) 190

FATHIMA BEEVI, VARGHESE KALLIATH
KANNAN NAMBIAR – Appellant
Versus
NARAYANI AMMA & ORS. – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. This is an appeal against the judgment in O. S. No. 11 of 1977 on the file of the Subordinate Judge's Court, Tellicherry. The suit O. S. No. 11 of 1977 was for partition.

2. Plaintiff is the daughter of one Lakshmi Amma. Lakshmi Amma had three brothers. Kunhappa alias Anandan Nambiar and defendants 1 and 2. Defendants 7 to 12 are the children of Kunhappa Nambiar Defendants 7 to 12 claim 1/4th share in the property scheduled in the plaint. They claim the property as the legal representatives of Kunhappa Nambiar. This claim is resisted by the plaintiff on the strength of a gift deed evidenced by Ext. Al. Ext. Al gift deed is dated 7-8-1956. This gift deed is in favour of Lakshmi Amma by Kunhappa Nambiar in respect of his share in the properties scheduled in the plaint. Plaintiff contended that defendants 7 to 12 had no right to get share in the properties scheduled. Defendants 7 to 12 in turn raised the contention that the gift deed is not valid and genuine.

3. The only point that survives for consideration in this appeal is the question of validity of the gift deed Ext. Al.

4. Now the details of the contention raised by defendants 7 to 12 in their written statement in re




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top