Judges : K.K.NARENDRAN,PARIPOORNAN
KESAVAN - Appellant
Versus
KRISHNAMMA - Respondent
Case No : C.R.P. No. 216 of 1978-I
Decided On : 11/05/1984
Advocates Appeared :
G. Janardhana Kurup; For Petitioner M.V. Ibrahimkutty; V. Ahmedkutty; For Respondent
Ezhava Act - Jurisdiction of Court - Interpretation and General Clauses Act 1125 - S.8 of Ezhava Act, 1100 - S.4(c) of Interpretation and General Clauses Act, 1125 - The court discussed the impact of the repeal of the Travancore Ezhava Act, 1100 by the Kerala Joint Hindu Family System (Abolition) Act, 1975 on the jurisdiction of the court to entertain a petition for dissolution of marriage under S.8 of the Ezhava Act. The court considered the effect of S.4(c) of the Interpretation and General Clauses Act, 1125 on the right accrued before the repeal and concluded that the petition for dissolution of marriage had to be filed before the Munsiff Court under S.8 of the Ezhava Act, even though the Ezhava Act stands repealed, in view of S.4(c of the Interpretation and General Clauses Act, 1125.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner husband filed a petition for dissolution of marriage under S.8 of the Travancore Ezhava Act, 1100. The respondent raised a preliminary objection that the Munsif's Court has no jurisdiction in the matter after the repeal of the Ezhava Act by the Kerala Joint Hindu Family System (Abolition) Act, 1975. The trial court upheld the objection and dismissed the petition. The civil revision challenged this decision.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petition for dissolution of marriage had to be filed before the Munsiff Court under S.8 of the Ezhava Act, even though the Ezhava Act stands repealed, in view of S.4(c) of the Interpretation and General Clauses Act, 1125.
Issues: The main issue was whether a petition for dissolution of marriage can be filed under S.8 of the Ezhava Act after its repeal by the Kerala Joint Hindu Family System (Abolition) Act, 1975.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the interpretation of S.4(c) of the Interpretation and General Clauses Act, 1125 and concluded that the right accrued before the repeal preserved the jurisdiction of the Munsiff Court to entertain the petition for dissolution of marriage.
Final Decision: The civil revision was allowed, and the trial court was directed to retake the petition for dissolution of marriage filed by the petitioner on the file and try and dispose of the same in accordance with law.
1. The short point that arises for consideration in this civil revision is whether after the repeal of the Travancore Ezhava Act, 1100 by the Kerala Joint Hindu Family System (Abolition) Act, 1975 a petition for dissolution of marriage can be filed under S.8 of the Ezhava Act, if before the repeal the wife refused to live with the husband. The decision on the point depends on the questions whether the repeal was a simple repeal and what is the impact of S.4(c) of the Interpretation and General Clauses Act, 1125 which corresponds to S.6(c) of the General Clauses Act, 1897 on the repeal.
2. The petitioner husband in the petition for dissolution of marriage under S.8 of the Travancore Ezhava Act, 1100 is the petitioner in the civil revision. The petitioner married the respondent while he was in the Air Force. Later, he was discharged from the Air Force and he settled down in his native place. On 16-9-1976 he requested the respondent wife to reside with him, but she refused. Thereafter, on 26-1-1977 he came to know that she got pregnant while he was away in Maharastra serving in the Air Force. On 16-2-1977 the petition for dissolution of marriage was filed before the Munsif's Court under S 8 of the Travancore Ezhava Act. Before that, the Travancore Ezhava Act was repealed by the Kerala Joint Hindu Family System (Abolition) Act, 1975 which came into force on 1-12-1976. The respondent raised a preliminary objection before the trial court that the Munsif's Court has no jurisdiction in the matter as after the repeal of the Ezhava Act by the Kerala Joint Hindu Family System (Abolition) Act, 1975 a petition for dissolution will lie only before the District Court under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 No mention was made in the objection about the averment that the respondent refused to go and reside with the petitioner when demanded on 16-9-1976. The trial court upheld the preliminary objection and dismissed the petition for dissolution as not maintainable before the Munsif's Court in view of the repeal of the Travancore Ezhava Act by the Kerala Joint Hindu Family System (Abolition) Act, 1976, holding that 'The General Clauses Act cannot come to the rescue of a person who files a petition under a repealed enactment'. The challenge in this civil revision is against the above order of the trial court. The learned judge before whom the revision came up for hearing, referred the same to a Bench.
3. S.4(b) and 29(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 read:
"4. Overriding effect of Act. Save as otherwise expressly provided in this Act,
(a)
(b) any other law in force immediately before the commencement of this Act shall cease to have effect in so far as it is inconsistent with any of the provisions contained in this Act."
"29. Savings.-(1) ...
(2) Nothing contained in this Act shall be deemed to affect any right recognised by custom or conferred by any special enactment to obtain the dissolution of a Hindu marriage, whether solemnized before or after the commencement of this Act.
(3) (4)
S. 7(2) of The Kerala Joint Hindu Family System (Abolition) Act, 1975 reads:
7. Repeal. (1)
(2) The Acts mentioned in the Schedule, in so far as they apply to the whole or any part of the State of Kerala, are hereby repealed
S. 4(c) of the Interpretation and General Clauses Act, 1125 which corresponds to S.6(c) of The General Clauses Act, 1897 reads:
"4. Effect of repeal. Where any Act repeals any enactment hitherto made or hereafter to be made, then, unless a different intention appears, the repeal shall not
(a)
(b)
(c) affect any right, privilege, obligation or liability acquired, accrued or incurred under any enactment so repealed; or"
4. The law relating to marriage (including dissolution of marriage) of the Ezhavas of Travancore, was contained in The Travancore Ezhava Act 3 of 1100 M.E., for short the Ezhava Act. Under S.8 of the Ezhava Act, a petition for dissolution of marriage had to be filed before the Munsif's Court. The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 is an Act 'to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.