SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Ker) 256

FATHIMA BEEVI, VARGHESE KALLIATH
RAMADAS DAMODER – Appellant
Versus
ANNA NIDHIYIRI – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. This is an appeal by the plaintiff. The suit was for recovery of the plaint schedule property, and alternatively for a declaration that the plaint schedule properties are Trust properties. The plaintiff further requested the court to frame a scheme for the proper management and utilisation of the income of the plaint schedule property on the basis that it is Trust property.

2. The plaint reveals, that the suit property originally belonged to Ranched Das Khathsee. Ranched Das Khathsee is the grand-father of the plaintiff. Ranched Das Khathsee died in February 1920. Some of the properties of Ranched Das Khathsee came into the possession of the plaintiff's father Damodar Ranched Das under a will of Ranched Das Khathsee. Damodar Ranched Das has three sons, plaintiff is one of the sons. Damodar Ranched Das died on 2-1-1962. The two brothers of plaintiff died in 1967. The will of Ranched Das Khathsee is exhibited in the suit as Ext. A-1. It is dated 26-7-1095. The plaint property is an item of property included in the will Ext. A-1. According to the plaintiff this item was set apart by plaintiff's grand-father for the purpose of certain charities to be done by plaintiff's f




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top