SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Ker) 125

K.K.NARENDRAN
ANTHONY AMMAL – Appellant
Versus
ANTONY – Respondent


Judgment :-

The short point that arises for consideration in this Civil Revision is whether the court can direct a sale of the property involved in a partition suit and distribution of the proceeds even in a case where a request is not made by a shareholder or shareholders interested individually or collectively to the extent of one moiety or upwards and whether such a sale should be conducted in open court. The plaintiff is the revision petitioner in this Civil Revision Petition. The challenge is against the order of the Munsiff's Court, Palghat dismissing an application for a review of an order refusing to give a direction to the commissioner appointed in a final decree proceedings in a suit for partition, to stop the sale. The commissioner appointed in the final decree proceedings reported to the court that the decree schedule properties can only be sold and the sale proceeds distributed among the sharers and that was allowed by the court. Accordingly, the commissioner fixed a date for selling the properties by auction among the sharers. It was then that the petitioner-plaintiff put in a petition to stay the auction sale. On the court rejecting that petition, the petitioner file

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top