SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Ker) 126

V.SIVARAMAN NAIR
VARKEY – Appellant
Versus
GOVINDAN – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. The Executive Sub Divisional Magistrate, Trichur had passed a conditional order dated 28-3-1979 under S.133 (1)(d) of the Code of Criminal Procedure directing respondents 1 to 3 to cut and remove three poola trees and one jack tree standing on the northern boundary of the petitioners' com-p6und dangerously situated and liable to fall on the house of the petitioners. That order was passed on the basis of the reports submitted by the Tahsildar, Trichur and Sub Inspector of Police, Trichur, Town West and directed the respondents to cut and remove the said trees on receipt of the order and also called upon them to show cause why that order should not be enforced and made absolute.

2. The respondents filed their objections in answer to the preliminary order, interalia contending that this is a civil dispute and not a public nuisance, in relation to which alone, the power under S.133 of the Criminal Procedure Code should be exercised. During the course of the proceedings, the respondents herein filed, a revision petition, before the Court of Sessions, Trichur under S.397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and also obtained an order of stay against the conditional order. The













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top