SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Ker) 118

V.SIVARAMAN NAIR
UNNIKRISHNAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. The accused in C.C. No. 71 of 1982 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ottapalam is the petitioner in this case. He had unsuccessfully appealed his conviction under S.394 of the Indian Penal Code and the sentence of rigorous imprisonment for three years before the Court of Session, Palghat in Criminal Appeal No. 163 of 1982. The challenge in this petition is against the judgment of the Court of Session confirming his conviction and sentence.

2. The facts are only a few, but the points involved are matters of great moment in the context of rights for personal liberty under Art.14 and 21 of the Constitution in the context of the obligation of the State to provide legal aid to the poor as provided under Art.39A of the Constitution and S.304 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

3. The petitioner is alleged to have threatened Pw.1 a female school teacher, with a dagger at about 7.30P.M. on 22-2-1982 while pw.1 was returning along a Panchayat road from Vengali temple, and he is alleged to have caught hold of a golden chain worn by pw.1. Since she resisted the petitioner's attempt to snatch away the chain, the petitioner could get only a portion of the gold chai























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top