SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Ker) 161

PARIPOORNAN
RAMACHANDRAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. The petitioner is one of the Directors of a private limited company, named 'Ravathy. Exports (PVT) Limited'. This O. P. has been filed praying for the issue of a writ of prohibition to restrain the respondents from enforcing recovery of any money against the petitioner in pursuance to Ext. P1 notice and also to quash Ext. P1 notice. Ext. P1 notice is one under the Revenue Recovery Act and is dated 2-6-1982. The movable property of the defaulter, named therein, (the petitioner herein) is sought to be proceeded against for arrears of sales-tax amounting to Rs. 65,201.80. The said amount of sales-tax is due for the year 1976-77, as a result of an assessment order effected on the company. The petitioner's case is, that he is not the defaulter and for arrears of tax due from the company, he cannot be proceeded against The recovery proceedings, evidenced by Ext. P1, is attacked as illegal and unauthorised.

2. No counter affidavit has been filed by the respondents in the O. P. It is the definite averment of the petitioner that he is not an assessee to sales-tax and no amount of salestax is due and payable by him. In the absence of a counter-affidavit the averments contained

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top