Judges : BALAKRISHNA MENON
PUSHPADHARAN - Appellant
Versus
FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA - Respondent
Case No : O.P. No. 1138 of 1979
Decided On : 02/22/1983
Advocates Appeared :
K.P. Dandapani; Sumathi Dandapani; For Petitioners C. Sankaran Nair; For Respondents
Art.14 and 16 of the Constitution - Classification based on source of recruitment for promotion to higher grade - Integration of direct recruits and promotees into one class - Amendments prescribing different periods of service for graduates and non-graduates for promotion to the cadre of Assistants Grade II are opposed to Art.14 and 16 of the Constitution
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners, Assistants Grade III in the Food Corporation of India, challenged the amendments to the Staff Regulations prescribing different periods of service for graduates and non-graduates for promotion to the cadre of Assistants Grade II, alleging violation of Art.14 and 16 of the Constitution.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the direct recruits and promotees were integrated into one class and were known by the same designation, had the same scale of pay, discharged the same functions, and held interchangeable posts. The court held that once the direct recruits and promotees were fused into one class, it was not competent for the authorities to discriminate between them in the matter of further promotion to the post of Assistant Grade II.
Issues: The main ground of attack against the amendments was that they were in violation of Art.14 and 16 of the Constitution, as they prescribed different periods of service for graduates and non-graduates for promotion to the cadre of Assistants Grade II.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the amendments prescribing different periods of service for graduates and non-graduates for promotion to the cadre of Assistants Grade II were opposed to Art.14 and 16 of the Constitution, as the direct recruits and promotees were integrated into one class and were known by the same designation, had the same scale of pay, discharged the same functions, and held interchangeable posts.
Final Decision: The court quashed the amendments to the Staff Regulations prescribing different periods of service for graduates and non-graduates for promotion to the cadre of Assistants Grade II, and also quashed the order rejecting the petitioner's representation.
1. The four petitioners are Assistants Grade III in the general administration cadre and the godown cadre of the Food Corporation of India (hereinafter referred to as the Corporation) working in different stations of its Southern Zone. They joined service in Category 4 of the Staff Regulations of the Corporation. The Staff Regulations were issued in 1971 in exercise of the powers conferred under S.45 of the Food Corporation of India Act, 1964 (Act 37 of 1964). Assistant Grade III falls under Category 3. Appointment to the post of Assistants Grade III is by direct recruitment of graduates and also by promotion from among matriculate employees in Category IV, with three years experience. As per the amended regulations, eighty per cent of the total vacancies of Assistants Grade III are to be filled up by direct recruitment of graduates. The promotion quota for matriculate Category IV employees is only twenty per cent. The Petitioners are matriculate Category IV employees who had secured promotion to the cadre of Assistants Grade III. The next higher post is of Assistant Grade II in Category III and as per the Staff Regulations of 1971 as it originally stood, the mode of recruitment is by promotion of employees with 3 years experience as Assistants Grade III/Typists/Telephone Operators, and in their absence by direct recruitment of graduates with 4 years experience in any office.
2. The 30th amendment of the Staff Regulations as per Ext. P-1 notification, dated 22nd April, 1976 relates to the General Administration Cadre. As per the amended provisions 3 years experience as Assistant Grade III/typist/telephone operator is fixed for graduates and 5 years experience for non-graduates for promotion to Grade II. A similar amendment was effected with respect to the Godown Cadre also requiring three years experience in the case of graduates and five years for non-graduates as per the 43rd amendment of the Staff Regulations. A true copy of the notification effecting the 43rd amendment is produced along with the Original Petition as Ext. P1 (a), dated 10th February 1977. As per the amended regulations non-graduate Assistants Grade III of the General Administration Cadre as well as of the Godown Cadre require five years experience for promotion to the post of Assistant Grade II, while as regards graduates the experience required is only of three years. Exts. P2 and P3 are copies of seniority lists of Assistants Grade III in the general administration and godown cadres respectively in the South Zone of the Food Corporation of India. Ext. P4, dated 10th August 1978 is a copy of the representation submitted by the 1st petitioner against the promotion of some of his juniors in service, consequent on the amendment of the Staff Regulations requiring five years experience for non-graduates for promotion to the post of Assistants Grade II and Ext. P5 is a similar representation submitted by the All India Food Corporation Executive Employees Federation. Ext. P6, dated 28th September 1978 is the reply to Ext. P4 by the Administrative Manager of the Regional Office of the Corporation stating that the 1st petitioner being a non-graduate has to complete five years of service as Assistant Grade III to become eligible for promotion to the post of Assistant Grade II. There is no reply to Ext. P5. Ext. P6 refers to a circular of the Food Corporation of India, dated 22nd December 1977, a true copy of which is produced as Ext. P7. Ext. P7 is also in conformity with the amended staff regulations requiring three years experience in the case of graduates and five years experience in the case of non-graduates to be eligible for promotion to the post of Assistant Grade II from the feeder category of Assistant Grade III. Ext. P8, dated 1st May 1974 is a circular issued from the Head Office of the Corporation wherein it is stated, that different qualifications are prescribed for appointment to the various grades, the qualification for appointment as Assis
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.