SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Ker) 138

V.SIVARAMAN NAIR
RAJAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. The question which the petitioner, a Senior among Junior Engineers (now Assistant Engineers) but a non-graduate, asks is the same which Bhagwati J., posed on behalf of persons like the petitioner in the decision in Mohd. Shujat Ali v. Union of India, AIR. 1974 SC. 1631,

"I am senior to the graduate Supervisor who is intended to be promoted. I am more suitable than he is. It is no doubt true that I am a non-graduate, but my not being a graduate has not been branded as a disqualification. I am regarded fit for promotion and, like the graduate Supervisor, I am equally eligible for being promoted. My technical equipment supplemented by experience is considered adequate for discharging the functions of Assistant Engineer. Then why am I being denied the opportunity for promotion and the graduate Supervisor is preferred?"

There cannot be any doubt about the answer after the decision of a Division Bench of this Court in Abdul Basheer v. Karunakaran, ILR.1981(2) Kerala 526. It can only be an invalidation of the rule which provides for this preference for the graduate junior.

2. Now to the facts, which makes the above question relevant and the only answer obligatory. The petition




















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top