SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Ker) 93

BALAKRISHNA MENON
GIRIJADEVI – Appellant
Versus
HORMIS THALIATH – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. This revision is against the order of the Munsiff's Court, Ernakulam, rejecting the petitioner's application to be impleaded as a party-defendant in O. S. No. 604 of 1982 on its file.

2. The petitioner and the 1st respondent in this revision are neighbouring owners of land having a compound wall to separate their respective plots of land. The petitioner is the owner of the western plot with a residential building thereon where she is residing with her family. The 1st respondent's plot is on the east of the petitioner's land.

3. The petitioner had filed O. S. No. 398 of 1981 on the file of the Munsiff's Court, Ernakulam, for an injunction against the 1st respondent from interfering with or altering the compound wall separating the plots of the petitioner and the 1st respondent. She had also applied for a temporary injunction for similar reliefs against the 1st respondent pending the suit. The 1st respondent entered appearance and after

hearing both sides the Munsiff's Court passed an order permitting the 1st respondent to make such alterations to the compound wall as are in conformity with R.30(5) of the Kerala Municipal Buildings Rules. It is the petitioner's case that










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top