SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Ker) 270

M.P.MENON
KERALA STATE HOUSING BOARD – Appellant
Versus
YUSUFF – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. The respondent moved an application, under S.20 of the Arbitration Act, for "filing" the arbitration agreement before court. He also applied for issue of a commission for local inspection, under 0.26 R.9 CPC. The petitioner contended that till an order of reference was made under sub-s. (4) of S.20, the power under S.41 of the Act could not be exercised. The court below did not express any opinion on this question of jurisdiction, but allowed the commission application. The petitioner objects.

2. In Baby Paul v. Hindustan Paper Corporation (AIR. 1978 Ker. 223) Vadakkel J. had taken the view that orders in respect of matters set out in items (1), to (4) of the Second Schedule to the Arbitration Act could be issued under S.41 (b) of the Act only after the passing of an order of reference. In other words, such orders could not be issued in proceedings under S.20 till the stage of reference was reached. Observing that such orders could only be interlocutory in nature, and that there could be no question of any interlocutory order till the arbitrator was seized of the main dispute, his Lordship said:

the court's power of making orders in respect of matters set out in items









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top