SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Ker) 126

P.SUBRAMONIAN POTI, U.L.BHAT
APPUKUTTAN PILLAY – Appellant
Versus
KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. The appellants before us in both these cases are the petitioners in the Original Petitions. Both of them were Advocates practising in the Quilon Bar. While so, they responded to a notification by the Kerala Public Service Commission inviting applications for appointment as Assistant Personnel Officers in the Kerala State Cashew Development Corporation Ltd. The candidates were to possess a degree in Arts, Science or Commerce or a Diploma in Social Science or the degree of M.S.W or a degree in law. Besides this they were to have practical experience of not less than two years after obtaining the academic qualification, in State Government or Central Government or any company registered under the Indian Companies Act. The petitioners in both these cases produced certificates showing experience for two years in two companies and evidently on the basis of these certificates also they were selected and advised for appointments.

Both of them were in due course appointed as Assistant Personnel Officers in the Kerala State Cashew Development Corporation Ltd. More than one year later the Kerala Public Service Commission seems to have thought of looking into the matter over agai





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top